Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto: Are 46 percent of brand Twitter followers “bots”?



Contributing Writer

Photo: Retro Robot  Credit: Sasan Saidi

Photo: Retro Robot Credit: Sasan Saidi

Reuters reported recently on a study published by an Italian communications professor that suggests that up to 46% of Twitter followers for brands may be bots.    It’s not entirely surprising as companies have been using autoresponders to “tailor” advertising messages to followers – augmenting follower counts is a logical extension of that.

The problem that I find with the study is the methodology.  Here are some key aspects:

- 39 brands were analyzed

- Since bots can’t be identified, account behaviors were analyzed to assess whether the account was bot or not.  Some of the criteria: no profile picture, no headline, only interfacing from one platform – attributes that could likewise identify an inactive user.

- A sample of 10,000 followers was analysed for each account.

While 10,000 random followers may be a statistically significant sample of each account, 39 accounts is most certainly not a statistically significant sampling of brands on Twitter.  In order to make any conclusions, the companies studied would have to be a significant (random) sample of both.  The ambiguous difference between the bot definition and inactive users also adds some uncertainty to the findings.  Given the odd methodology, the 46% number is meaningless.  The true statement is that up to 100% of brand followers could be bots.  It’s a possibility, but has very little relevance to anyone following a brand on Twitter (though if you follow a brand on Twitter, the likelihood that 100% of its followers are bots decreases).

All things considered though, it appears that Reuters and the study authors tempered their conclusions (more or less) to the constraints of their data set.  The same cannot be said for subsequent reports about the study:

Nearly Half of all Twitter Followers are Bots

Companies’ Twitter Followers Mostly Robots: Study

Almost half of Twitter brand profiles’ followers are ‘robots’: Study

Didn’t you know it? Half of the followers of businesses on Twitter are actually robots

Study Finds 46% Of Company Twitter Account Followers Are Bots

 

The data of course doesn’t substantiate any of these headlines, but you can see how a slightly flawed anecdotal study can be blown out of proportion.

The reality of a study on bot followers is that it’s of zero relevance to anyone using Twitter.  It does however underpin social advertising tactics, showing that there is real opportunity for businesses to genuinely engage people in a space where many businesses will not.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Did you enjoy this post?  Consider sharing future posts with a Facebook task or Twitter task through ifttt

Not into long-term commitments?  Please consider sharing via the share buttons above.

Thanks for your support – please shoot me a note and tell me what I can do for you (can I like you on Facebook, follow you on Twitter, share your blog, do your dishes?)!  ***disclaimer – I hate doing dishes***

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Photo Credit

Jim Dougherty

Jim Dougherty

Writer and chief of miscellany at leaderswest.com

I aspire to give people something to think about rather than tell them what to do. My favorite Google Alert is “social media research,” I am increasingly compelled by Gen Z, and I appreciate good writers agnostic of where they write. At one time I was Kred’s 12th most influential social media blogger and Klout’s most influential person on the topic of David Hasselhoff. Transplant from Seattle living in Cincinnati. Haven’t entirely adopted the local sports teams yet.

Jim Dougherty

@jimdougherty

Writer about social media and tech at Leaders West, I also tweet as @leaderswest.

@marta_social A serendipitous analogy, then. :) – 26 mins ago

Jim Dougherty

Jim Dougherty

Related posts

  • http://aigendigitalmarketing.com/soluciones-web/seo-posicionamiento-en-buscadores/ Abel Pardo Fernández – SEO León

    I agree with you, Jim. This study is significant for the studied brands because it’s significant, but if we compare the amount of companies with the total amount it Twitter it’s not significant. So, numbers must be taken carefully.

    Good post!

  • http://leaderswest.com Jim Dougherty

    Thanks so much Abel for reading and commenting – some really strange research being misrepresented right now…. or am I just now paying attention? :)

  • http://www.wizzardsblog.com Richard Arblaster

    One of the reasons why it isn’t all about the followers.

    I fell into the trap when I first got into twitter a few years ago, thinking that having lots of followers was a “badge of honour”. That somehow having thousands of followers really meant something. It’s quality over quantity any day.

  • Lori Simonis

    Great article Jim. But, it’s Domo Arigato…. thank you very much :)

  • http://leaderswest.com Jim Dougherty

    心から感謝、ロリ!日本とステュクスのための私の愚かさに恥ずかしい! (Domo Arigato, Lori!)

  • Lori Simonis

    私はすべてを理解することをことを確かめ M. そして、個人的なメモ、期待をよくしています。 私たちは、あなたが逃す。

  • http://leaderswest.com Jim Dougherty

    So Google Translate reads your note back to me like this: “M. and I make sure that you understand everything, we have good personal notes, and expectations. We will miss you.” :) I think Google translates everything like a David Lynch movie! Hope you have a wonderful weekend – so great to hear from you!

Top