How (not) to measure Social Media ROI #infographic



Contributing Writer

Photo: Computer Danger Credit:Gabriella Fabbri


An interesting infographic by Inventhelp has been making the rounds entitled, “How to Determine Facebook and Twitter ROI”  (return on investment).  What’s a little shocking (even by the low standards of infographics) is that it doesn’t broach the subject of social media ROI at all.  It’s a collection of exceptional and / or misleading data, among these:

- It details a 33% increase in sales of Jimmy Choo trainers attributable to Twitter, which is not accurate.  Twitter was a smaller piece of a larger Foursquare campaign that gained traction when picked up by traditional media.

- It intimates that 10% of Joie de Vivre’s 10,000 Twitter followers participated in a single $79 per night promotion.  In the Techcrunch article that the info was derived from, the $79 promotion was an example promotion of deeply discounted rates being offered last minute through social channels (not just Twitter), and they estimated they had sold 1000 in a year, not just with one campaign.

- It details a digital campaign for Edible Arrangements which led to “double digit” increases in annual sales, yet the campaign only lasted for 30 days.

As Christopher Penn points out on his blog (I think it’s in his book White Belt Marketing as well), return on investment (ROI) is a pretty straightforward calculation:

(Income Earned from Marketing Efforts subtracted by Marketing Expenses) divided by Marketing Expenses

Respective of the platitudes on the infographic that’s how you measure ROI.   For social media ROI, one would have to have a mechanism that specifically ties the social media activity to income earned, so saying that annual sales increases are attributable to one month of promotion may not be accurate… or it could be.  If it is, it is an exceptional example and not something particularly useful to emulate.

ROI is generally tied to a timeframe, and the capability to achieve positive ROI within a specified time with social media (especially on the outset) is difficult.   The reason that bigger businesses won’t participate in social (except to advertise) is that the resources necessary for a scaled engagement would be massive.  In his book Enchantment, Guy Kawasaki uses the New York Times as an example of how difficult an engagement of that magnitude would be.   Yet lack of ROI isn’t something unique to social media.  Ad Age reported earlier this year that a majority of companies surveyed didn’t use ROI metrics to inform their marketing plans.

Every sales guru from Zig Ziglar to Jeffrey Gitomer preaches the power of relationship in sales.  What social media offers is an opportunity to personally connect with people with unprecedented scale and targeting.  Trying to gain immediate, short-term social media ROI shows a lack of understanding of the channel, especially in light of the fact that most companies aren’t holding traditional channels to that same standard.  Sadly I don’t think that this is the point that the infographic was trying to make by not discussing social media ROI, but it bears repeating that social remains a huge differentiating opportunity for small businesses.  The big companies are reticent to commit the resources necessary to engage.

It’s worth noting that measuring social media is a little more complex than simply calculating return on investment.  It may be smarter to determine a strategy and develop intermediate metrics that escalate to measuring long-term returns.  If short-term ROI is a concern it might be worthwhile to devote resources to paid search or advertising each being more congruent to a short-term strategy than social.

 

Infographic - Social Media ROI

Infographic – Social Media ROI

Jim Dougherty

Jim Dougherty

Writer and chief of miscellany at leaderswest.com

I aspire to give people something to think about rather than tell them what to do. My favorite Google Alert is “social media research,” I am increasingly compelled by Gen Z, and I appreciate good writers agnostic of where they write. At one time I was Kred’s 12th most influential social media blogger and Klout’s most influential person on the topic of David Hasselhoff. Transplant from Seattle living in Cincinnati. Haven’t entirely adopted the local sports teams yet.

Jim Dougherty

@jimdougherty

Writer about social media and tech at Leaders West, I also tweet as @leaderswest.

Altimeter Joined H&R Block And Expion To Chat Employees and Amplification http://t.co/bjsGf9xoQP via @ShellyKramer – 11 hours ago

Jim Dougherty

Jim Dougherty

Related posts

  • Nickolay Lamm

    In your article you say that the data is “misleading.” However, just because Twitter was not the sole reason for the 33% sales increase or that the $79 promotion was not just with Twitter, doesn’t mean that, statistically, Twitter didn’t do anything. Only Jimmy Choo and Joie de Vivre Hotels know the exact increases in sales as a result of Twitter.

    @DellOutlet, according to this article (http://mashable.com/2009/06/11/delloutlet-two-million/) has made millions as a result of Twitter. Were their deals shown elsewhere? Most likely. Does that take away from their Twitter success? Absolutely not.

    The point of the infographic is that marketers have to make an effort to correlate sales with their social media efforts. Too many social media gurus talk about “brand building” and “followers.” That all sounds great. It’s time marketers start talking about sales.

  • http://www.balboacapital.com Derek Thomas

    Insightful and well-written article on social media and the infographic is top-notch. Thank you for posting this; it contains some great and timely information that will definitely help us out when monitoring and measuring our online efforts and social media campaigns.

  • http://leaderswest.com Jim Dougherty

    Appreciate you reading, Nickolay. If you glean insight from that infographic more power to you. Note that I linked to all of the sources of that data to substantiate my points.

  • http://www.wonderoftech.com Carolyn | Wonder of Tech

    Thanks for setting us straight, Jim. I saw this Infographic at a couple of different sites and couldn’t help but wonder about the accuracy of the information presented. ROI for social media is very difficult to measure and this information seemed a bit too simplistic.

    Infographics are a powerful medium, but the underlying information needs to be accurate.

  • http://inspiretothrive.com Lisa

    Even traditional media at times can be tough to measure results. It really depends on how one monitors the mediums. It also depends on the offers too. In print sales when someone said it didn’t work we would ask if they would run an ad for a FREE product and of course they said no, we would get bombarded. Go figure!

  • Simon

    The quoted ROI statement: (Income Earned from Marketing Efforts subtracted from Marketing Expenses) divided by Marketing Expenses – or (ME-I)/ME, will be -ve unless ME is bigger than I which is surely not good?

  • http://www.modernlifeblogs.com Amit Verma

    Nice infographic and great post :-)

  • http://leaderswest.com Jim Dougherty

    Absolutely correct Simon thanks for noting that! Of course it is subtracted “by” which I’ve corrected thanks to your note. Appreciate you reading and commenting!

  • http://leaderswest.com Jim Dougherty

    Thanks, Amit!

  • http://leaderswest.com Jim Dougherty

    Great point, Lisa! Unless there is a mechanism (promotional code) or something exclusive to a channel it’s very difficult to attribute sales to a particular promotion or channel. I think the Ad Age article really surprised some people to discuss that a lot of marketing decisions and feedback are subjective rather than informed by metrics. Thank you so much for reading and commenting! Such a wonderful insight!

  • http://leaderswest.com Jim Dougherty

    Appreciate you reading and commenting, Derek. Cheers!

  • http://leaderswest.com Jim Dougherty

    Thanks so much for taking the time to read and comment on this Carolyn. I’m pretty rough on infographics because they’re such a blatant form of link bait. This one is awfully strange in how it is both intentionally misleading and doesn’t even discuss what it purports to talk about. Truth told (and I know you understand this) – the effort necessary to successfully engage a community of people is extraordinary and people don’t want to see an infographic that tells them they have to spend more resources to gain something that’s very difficult to quantify. Thanks again for taking the time to comment!

  • Pingback: Birthdays and Brainstorming – Best of the Web! | Firepole Marketing Blog

  • Pingback: 52 Articles About the ROI of Social Media | Spotlight on Marketing

  • Pingback: My Homepage

  • Pingback: 章子怡)

  • http://www.jeremyfloyd.com Jeremy Floyd

    Glad you made this Jim. I really found the results of your survey of what motivated consumers to like a brand to be very informative as I’m putting an updated deck together for my Digital Marketing class. Thanks!

  • jimdougherty

    Cheers, Jeremy! Thanks for your comment and for reading.

Top