How thoughtful social media strategy can influence people to buy



Contributing Writer

Illustration: Binary Code Credit: Flavio Takemoto


Let’s face it:  Consumers are not logical.  Social media users are no exception.

And because they are not logical, brands exist.  Nobody is Spock.  A consumer either wants a product, or needs a product.  But why do they prefer certain brands over others? It’s not because it makes more sense to buy brand A over brand B when both products do the same thing.  As consumers how do we decide that a brand is better?   There are a lot of psychological factors that play into the decision.   Here are some best practices for how a brand can use social media to earn consumer loyalty.

Finesse their Emotions

Consumers have an emotional attachment towards brands. I would never buy anything but “Kraft peanut butter”, “Heinz ketchup”, or “Tide detergent.” These are the brands I grew up with – the brands my mother used to give me.  They remind me of my childhood.  If you can create an emotional attachment to your brand, consumers will be loyal.

  • Share pictures that trigger nostalgia, and how your brand was there ‘when times were better.’
  • Share content or videos that trigger laughter. When people are happy, they buy things. Make your customers laugh!
  • Kittens, puppies, and babies always work! Post anything that is cute, and let people comment on it.

Use Principals of Reciprocity

If you like them, they’ll like you back!  Have you ever heard of Joe Girard?  He used to sell an average of six cars per day when he was a car salesman.  The reason why he was so successful was because of these three simple words: “I like you.”

  • Be nice to your customers online!  Thank them every chance you have.
  • If a customer complains online, offer help and be genuine about it.  They’ll appreciate it!

Vary Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Rewards

The reason why Facebook works so well is because of social rewards.  The word “Like” is used for a reason: when people post something on a social media channel and others “Like” it, they feel good. Social rewards = intrinsic rewards.  If Facebook had not used the word “Like”, would it be as successful?

Now compare Facebook to Groupon.  Groupon is less successful because they use extrinsic rewards.   They give their users discounts which users quickly tire of (and leave).  Nobody is as loyal to Groupon as they are loyal to Facebook. You can use these same principals of intrinsic vs. extrinsic rewards for your social media strategy.

  • Draw people in with extrinsic rewards – use discounts, coupons, limited time offers, etc.
  • Weed out extrinsic rewards gradually, but introduce more chances for intrinsic rewards.
  • Examples of intrinsic rewards: Empower your top fans by thanking them (Radian6 does a good job at this on their Facebook Page), do photo captions, encourage your fans to post on your brand’s page (and thank them for it).  These are the types of rewards, not coupons, that will keep your social media fans engaged.

Motivation vs. ‘Easiness’ Is Key

The less a customer is motivated to participate with your brand, the easier it has to be for them to participate.  The harder it is to participate, the more motivated they need to be.  This is what BJ Fogg’s Behaviour Model is all about.

  • Make sure it is as easy as possible to find your brand.  Update your SEO, make sure your content is easy to share with social share buttons, etc.
  • Make your calls to action as simple as possible.  Ask yourself, am I making it incredibly, stupidly easy that they just have to follow through?   Does it take 2, 3, 5, or 10 steps for customers to make a purchase (or get a quote)?   Face it, most consumers are lazy.  That one extra step might be the difference between closing a sale, or closing your web page.

Have you thought about the psychological factors influencing social media strategy before? Which tips and tricks have you used? Did they work (or not work)? Please share in the comments below! :)

Photo Credit

Daniel Hebert

Daniel Hebert is an award-winning graduate of Mount Allison University. While he studied marketing, his favourite subject was learned outside the classroom: Social Media Strategy. Daniel has been a social media manager in the B2B sector, and now has his own blog. Daniel’s social media presence has gotten him a lot of attention in his local community, which has lead to guest speaking events. It also led to others writing pieces about his social media approach, including articles from Ragan Communications, Media Bistro, and Chris Dessi, CEO of Silverback Social. Daniel has an entrepreneurial, self-motivated attitude, which has led him to be a finalist in one of Canada’s top business competition for students. If he wasn’t a marketer, he would take his love for food and become a chef. He lives in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Daniel Hebert

@danielghebert

Influencer Relationship Manager at @InNetworkInc. Co-Founder at @SteamFeedCom. Love to play guitar & pretend I’m a chef :)
http://linkedin.com/in/danielghebert

#FF Give @nosaj_jason a follow he tweets about social media and tech :) – 37 mins ago

Daniel Hebert

Latest posts by Daniel Hebert (see all)

Daniel Hebert

Related posts

  • http://leaderswest.com Jim Dougherty

    Dan, great article. The best practices and insights that you share are really strong. Many of your points reinforce insights from Robert Cialdini’s book “Influence” and Roger Dooley’s book “Brainfluence.” I really appreciate the time you took to construct this piece – you certainly raise the bar for the site with this one!

  • http://danielghebert.wordpress.com Daniel Hebert

    Thanks for the comment Jim! :)

    One very important aspect of marketing is Psychology. There are a lot of subtle influences that affect us on a daily basis, and using these influences should be no exception on social media.

    I’m glad you enjoyed the piece!

  • http://www.radian6.com/ Jason Boies

    Hey thanks for the shout out, Dan. :)

    I love the bit about finessing the emotions. And you’re right about kittens and puppies. I once told a vet I met on Twitter that the internet is pretty much ruled by funny/adorable dog and cat pics and that they had a golden opportunity to start sharing pics from around their facility on social media for some pretty easy likes/shares. :)

    Anyway, good read as always from you, my friend.

    Jason Boies
    Radian6 Community Engagement

  • http://danielghebert.wordpress.com Daniel Hebert

    Thanks for the comment Jason!

    There’s just something about a cute kitten or puppy that attracts your ‘Like’. Even if your company isn’t related to animals, a cute pic once in a while can create some engagement on your page. Face it, your clients are people, and people love cute things! :P

  • Pingback: How thoughtful social media strategy can influence people to buy | UpSearchSEO

  • Michael Pierce

    What are you thoughts on the whole Chich-Fil-A trainwreck, specifically the fake facebook user profile’s they used to counter negative comments on their facebook page?

    http://gizmodo.com/5928926/chick+fil+a-got-caught-pretending-to-be-a-fake-teenage-girl-on-facebook

    Clearly they’ve never heard of tineye.com, which is a picture search engine. But my question to you, in relation to your points on “finesse their emotions” and reciprocity, is this: at what point does it make sense for a company to choose a side on a topic as heated as LGBT rights? Does it make sense for a company to donate millions to charity groups that work against equal rights, if it pleases some customers but is extremely offensive to others? As outraged as some people are over this issue, Chic-Fil-A’s facebook page has thousands of comments from people who like the company MORE because of their stance. Is it strategically sound for a company to lie on their facebook page (in this case, regarding Jim Henson), and use “sock puppet” accounts to attack opposing opinions, if it appeases one of their larger markets? Does it make sense to reciprocate to one side over the other, instead of taking the middle ground?

    Basically, moral and ethical issues aside, are Chic-Fil-A’s actions good for business, or have they shot themselves in the foot? Is there logic behind them, or have they lost touch? There is the popular conception that marketers are without morals, and this is more ammunition for that argument. As people become more and more polarized in their beliefs and morals, this is an problem that will arise again and again.

    Consumers may not be logical, but some do have morals. Even Spock would agree. When the mayor of a major metropolitan area says you’re company is not welcome in his city, you’ve messed up.

    Sorry if this is too serious of a comment, but it really shows how social media, if done improperly, can be devastating for a company. In this case, an image of the facebook imposter was posted to reddit two hours after the account posted on facebook, and two days later Colbert rants about it in front of a national audience on the Colbert Report. That’s the power of social media at it’s best.

  • http://danielghebert.wordpress.com Daniel Hebert

    Thanks for your comment Mike!

    First of all, there is no such thing as a ‘too serious’ comment :P . All comments are welcome here!

    To answer your question on ‘Is it strategically sound for a company to lie on their facebook page (in this case, regarding Jim Henson), and use “sock puppet” accounts to attack opposing opinions, if it appeases one of their larger markets?’, the answer is no. We live in an age of transparency. What I mean by that is information is easily available to us over the internet. And because of this, if a company lies, people will quickly find out! Customers lose trust in companies that lie. If you can’t trust a brand, what is a customer going to do? Switch to the next best offer (brand). Short answer, never lie on social media, or it will bite back.

    For your other major point ‘at what point does it make sense for a company to choose a side on a topic as heated as LGBT rights?’, a company should be very careful on which sides they choose on a tricky subject. My advice would be that if you’re a brand, try to stay clear of any topics that concern religion, racism, gender inequality, Gay and Lesbian rights, ect. Everyone has an opinion about them, and as soon as you make a stance, you’ll offend someone. If you don’t mention it, nobody will be offended.

    I appreciate your comment Mike!

  • http://leaderswest.com Jim Dougherty

    Don’t you think that depends somewhat on the product? Think about Fox News – in general it would be ill-advised to be so fervent in your political viewpoint, but Fox has created an entire channel dedicated to those views.
    Dan Casey of Chik-Fil-A took a stand based upon his beliefs (presumably) with the understand that he could alienate customers – that isn’t necessarily the wrong tact, it’s just the wrong tact to make more money. The other stuff Chik-Fil-A did in response was just pathetic.
    There’s no best way to sell to people – but there are qualitatively better ways.
    Great insight, guys!

  • Pingback: How to easily create an author-specific RSS feed with Feedburner

  • http://danielghebert.wordpress.com Daniel Hebert

    Thanks for your comment Jim!

    I understand your point. A news corp like Fox News should report on politics, gay rights, acts of racism, etc. However, being a news corp, they are only there to present the facts, not their opinions. They should be remaining impartial to any arguments. If they take a stance for one side over the other, it suddenly becomes an opinion piece, and no longer news. If a news corp starts presenting opinions as news, then what’s going to happen is they will start manipulating the publics opinion.

    It’s ok for a brand to take a stance. However, they need to be able to defend their claims openly, not by sneaking around like Chik-Fil-A did.

  • http://bundlepost.com Robert Caruso

    Nicely done Daniel!

  • http://danielghebert.wordpress.com Daniel Hebert

    Thanks Robert! :)

  • http://www.MyPhillyAlive.com Jeff Belonger

    Daniel, Good article… not to sound negative…. but I guess I wanted to point out, just because you do a lot of what you mentioned, doesn’t mean they come, buy, or are loyal. I have found loyalty is lacking more than it should… specially if you did a great job before. Doing mortgages for 20 years, I found people were sold very easily on broken or misleading promises, because they were told what they wanted to hear. I do believe in much of that was said, but don’t hang my hat on it. In regards to brands and such…. i have been cutting corners in the grocery store and buying no name brands or that store brand and not the large brand name, saving tons of money, and 90% of the time, it tastes the same or sometimes better. Just wondering how people are thinking now, because of the economy…

  • http://danielghebert.wordpress.com Daniel Hebert

    Thanks for the comment Jeff!

    And you’re right, doing the following best practices doesn’t guarantee that a customer will be loyal or buy, but it also doesn’t hurt, haha :P

  • http://leaderswest.com Jim Dougherty

    Isn’t everything we do just to increase our odds of success? There are no guarantees of anything, but there are tacts that are more likely to be successful than others. Great insight!

  • http://danielghebert.wordpress.com Daniel Hebert

    Exactly Jim!

    These are all tried and true psychological theories that are used in not just business, but in everyday life.

    I’ve learned in my consumer behaviour courses that nostalgia triggers emotions, which increases buying.

    I learned in sports marketing that when your home team wins the game, you’re much more likely to make a donation when you get out the door than if your team lost, because you are happy.

    Reciprocity has been used as a sales tactic for years. When you’re nice to someone, they are more likely to be nice to you.

    Intrinsic vs. extrinsic rewards run on the principals of applied behaviourism, or behaviour modification.

    Motivation vs. Easiness is a theory developed by BJ Fogg.

    These are all well known theories that have been studied by psychologists for years. In most cases, they work. It doesn’t mean that they will work all the time, but if it increases the odds of someone buying your product, there’s no harm in trying them out! :)

  • Pingback: How thoughtful social media strategy can influence people to buy (by Daniel Hebert) | Thomas Huber

  • Pingback: Thoughtful social media strategy can influence people to buy – EviePost

  • Pingback: Guest Posts and a Puppy « danielghebert

  • Pingback: Proven strategies to get more traffic to your site | UpSearchSEO

Top